Over the last 4 seasons including the current one, the total tally for SportsBettingChamp is 490 wins and only 15 loses. Obviously, I can't go over the actual details of the system but they are based on naturally, a certain event occurring. From years of statistical input, this guy has worked out that you've got around a 97% probability of a certain event occurring which may be "A", "B" or "C" as sub-events within this event.
Yes, there is a betting strategy built into it based on which sub-event is occurring. Yes, points are part of the system as well which is 2 to 3 points that from statistical input as mentioned, is part of the equation of experiencing a 97% probability of occurring. Based on his record so far of 490-15, if a person were to bet $10 or $37 or $110 depending on which sub-event was occurring, for all the picks so far, that person would have made $10,944 and lost $2,355 calculating to a Net Profit of $8,589.
Obviously, if the bets are bigger, the income and profit will be bigger as well. John's playground to make around $450,000 as he claims would require bets of $500, $1,280 & $4,400 depending on the sub-event occurring. From my deductions, sub-event A occurs around 30% of the time, B occurs around 56% of the time and C occurs 11% of the time. A loss occurs around 3% of the time. The stats seem solid and I can verify good results. At the end of the day, everyone gets 8 weeks moneyback guarantee through Clickbank but I'm personally looking at it as a mid to long-term revenue stream that's also a bit of fun and I've made some friends with other subscribers.
These are the facts, warts and all. The system makes money but will only be available for a short time supposedly as John does not want too many people in the system. Consider taking the easy road with the rest of us and SportsBettingChamp.
March 8 Update: Last win on Friday night made it 496 winning picks so far, still with only 15 losses.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
15 comments:
Hey Michael,
You've forgotten to take off the amount you lose when Bet A or Bet B don't come through.
i.e. If you're betting $110, you'll get back $64 on a moneyline of 170, however you've already lost $10 + $37 on A and B which you haven't taken into consideration. When you factor this in, you get $3,026 over all games, not $8,589.
Still if you're playing with 10X this (which I am) it's still a great result.
thx..Dan
Hey Dan,
Thanks for your input. Without recalculating for now, I think you're right although I do want to confirm (My post was a little rushed) but I see your point.
It's really good to see your positive feedback and the size of bank you're utilizing. I want to build my bank without refunding. I have to admit that I got caught out a couple of times with the escalating bets required on a C bet which is why I always recommend anyone and everyone to start small as a $10 bet is potentially around $147. In your case, even more so eh? $100 on an A is potentially around $1,500... so the problem is when a person really "bets" the occurrence of the A for example at $100 and then gets caught out having to come up with another $370 and possibly another $1,100 after that, and that person does not have the funds to carry on. I figure if a person grows steady, without rushing, their balance should grow consistently. Do you agree?
Absolutely right. I started off with quite a large bank (over $15,000 with bonus) so I could afford a disasterous run of about 10 losses in a row.
We all know this just doesn't happen though with the 490/15 record but as long as you keep a decent buffer you'll be fine no matter what you bet. The % increase is still the same no matter what you've got and if you gauge the levels right for your balance you should be fine.
I've been at the $100 level since the start of the NBA season and am up about $5000 so far....you could say "all it takes is 4 losses in a row and you're out of profit" and that's true but I have faith in the stats of 97% that have been evident for the last 50 years or so.
Anyway..keep up the blog, it's good to know that someone else is doing it too.
P.S. I've had my fair share of people saying it's a scam and saying "if it's that easy then why isn't everyone doing it" but these people are misunderstanding the system, and it is just that...a system. John's not saying he can pick 97 winners out of 100 on individual matches but in the framework of the system this is the fugure that comes out.
I'm ranting now and my lunchtime's over..it'll be interesting when he starts with the MLB bets as well, that really is unknown territory for me.
P.P.S. It's even more interesting that as the A bets win only 30% of the time it actually makes more sense to ONLY bet on B and C..if you think about it 70% of the time you're just throwing that first $100 away. I'm not sure if this 30/56/11/3 ratio works every season but if it did and you didn't bet on A your profits would then go up to $5,467.
Thanks Dan, that's really insightful. Sidenote: did you here about the new NHL system only available to subscribers just released today? I'm personally really excited about partaking in the MLB, and now, the NHL as well as there will be approx 3x more opportunities which means I'm rolling-over the money 3x more which, all things in balance, should see my account not only grow a lot more every year, but also not be solely dependent on the NBA. (Note to Self: Check out some European Soccer systems)
Re: the A/B breakdown, I've asked for details on that, but I do know the As & Bs account for 86% in total as John stated in an email couple of weeks back. And I personally think the As account for the smaller breakdown of the A/B which makes sense, but I didn't mean they only win 30% of the time but rather make up around 30% of the 86% A/B wins (it may be higher). Plus how about Detroit killing Phoenix on Sunday, plus it's the smallest investment, plus if you were waiting for the B & C, they may not win either, particularly as the A has already realized the 97% probability.
Thanks for the comp re the blog :-)
Hey Michael, we have chatted a little through emails but I thought i would discuss things here to help "regular" people understand that this is a good system. One thing I might be misunderstanding though is moneyline/spread situation. I understood the system to be telling us to bet the spread + 3 points not the moneyline. When backtesting, the wins are all there. I am on track right?
Hey James,
I'm glad to here your wins are all there. Yes, you are on track. Bet the points.
..and thanks for commenting.
Michael, is the NHL system available to people who join now? Or it will be available at another price? In the official website there is not nothing about that NHL
The NHL system is a different system only available to existing members. It has never been available before and is not included as part of the SBC system which only focuses on the NBA and MLB. I have not seen it yet myself but am intending on getting it before the NHL season starts.
How is the SportsBettingChamp plan going?
Is it possible to just straight bet and take the losses without progressive beating and chasing the losses?
What are the actual stats when it comes to picking the games correctly from the get-go?
Seems easier to just bet the games, pick the winners as suggested and win or lose on that, less drama and would likely still be in good profit.
Would this not work?
Dean
say I want to make 100k in a years time with just the NBA and MLB systems. How much would I need to start with? How much would my bets have to be?
Say there are 150 events to bet on throughout the season between the NBA and MLB. To make $100K, you would want to make around $700 per event. To do this, you would need to make fairly large bets of around $1,000 but you may need to have around $5,000 in your account to accommodate for potential losses. However, if you are serious about making this amount, you should consider starting with a bank of around $10,000.
The alternative is you start small and grow your bets organically as your account amount increases.
To make money on virtually anything including sports betting, it's good to have a plan. This is not crystal ball gazing and John does not possess the fabled sports almanac from the future. It's important to stick to a system and Sports Betting Champ is no different. The reality is that statistically over many, many past seasons, the stats have revealed an anomaly, which is what the picks are based on. The winning results are impressive to say the least and that's why I play it for the long term on semi-autopilot as just another income stream.
Michael,
I'm so glad I came across your blog, as I've been really confused and bewildered by all the comments I've seen so far about sportsbettingchamp
I knew that the enormous number of testimonials just could not be faked, and perhaps some people misunderstood the system or never even purchased it, and were making misguided comments without even knowing how the system truly worked.
I just sort of knew that the system had some sort of progression to it, and that you had to buy points on the line.
My question pertains to the bankroll and betting amounts, which from what I can see is very crucial due to the rather steep progression involved, which is 10, 37, 110 - from what I've observed on the blog? With a bankroll of $1000, what would you recommend for the starting amount? $50?
Also, are points bought on each bet, meaning a moneyline of 170 each time?
Thanks in advance for your help,
Paul
Hi Everyone,
I too thought this was a scam/load of old nonsense but I have a had a fantastic run with the system since buying it (along with John's Champ Selections) a week ago. A measly £110 is now £890! I'm using my own rules and doing everything non Betfair, which is giving around 30% better returns per bet than BetUS.
I'll be making regular updates at my blog and I'll keep out for updates on yours too. I'm at http://www.internet-money-making-guide.com/
Many thanks for a good article.
Simon.
thanks for your feedback Simon.
I will be blogging results from
The Champ Selections on a dedicated blog soon as the results so far have been really good.
Post a Comment